I thought that Kevin Drum summed up Bork pretty well, though he’s a critic:
If a company is providing good value to consumers, then it’s OK regardless of how big it is or how large its market share is.
He also attempts to fault the reasoning on the basis that monopoly will ultimately prove bad. His examples though in the tech industry show that monopoly more often than not is fleeting, so I think advantage to the late Judge Bork.
Brucetheeconomist's Blog 