I hope the New Republic is right: Why The Romney Doctrine Won’t Resemble The Bush Doctrine | The New Republic


I hope the New Republic has this right. My greatest fear if Obama is defeate (as I think it possible though far from inevitable) it that war with Iran follows in short order. That would prove we learned nothing from the Iraq fiasco, and we’re repeating it.

The Republican presidential primary has provided ample display of the party’s penchant for bellicosity in foreign affairs, and last night’s debate was no exception. It’s a posture that’s understandably gotten many liberals worried about a reprisal of the famously interventionist Bush Doctrine. “God help us if any of these jokers makes it into the White House,” wrote Fred Kaplan of Slate after watching the previous GOP’s national security debate.

But maybe liberals shouldn’t fret so much. Yes, imagining any of the various Republican novelty candidates as the next commander-in-chief is a frightening prospect. But if we assume that the establishment candidate, Mitt Romney, wins the nomination, it seems unlikely that he’ll be inclined to reenact the presidency of George W. Bush.

via Barron YoungSmith: Why The Romney Doctrine Won't Resemble The Bush Doctrine | The New Republic.

Advertisements

One response to “I hope the New Republic is right: Why The Romney Doctrine Won’t Resemble The Bush Doctrine | The New Republic

  1. Agree with your hope – but after Mitt’s comment regarding Iran’s nuclear desire, I not so sure. Then again, he likes to say stuff for the sake of saying it.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s